Order-source review: from reviewing everything to managing exceptions
The review process was heavily manual, the inputs were fragmented, and peak-period backlogs turned directly into lost orders. The fix was not more reviewers.
The problem
KYC review of order sources was almost entirely manual.
- Expensive and inelastic
- Each case took 10 to 15 manual steps and 40 to 120 minutes.
- Fragmented inputs
- Alongside standard system integrations, orders arrived as web forms and as PDFs or images attached to email.
- A capacity ceiling that cost orders
- During order surges, volume spiked, review backed up, the team worked late, and waiting time on queued cases stretched far enough to lose business.
What we built
- 01A dual-track extraction architecturethat moves the operating model from "review everything" to exception management. Standardised sources such as API and EDI flow straight into an automated validation pool. Non-standard sources go through RPA and automated extraction, with multimodal AI and LLMs parsing PDFs and images to pull out registration numbers, responsible parties, line items and addresses.
- 02Risk scoring and automatic triageExternal digital-footprint checks combine with an internal transaction-behaviour model to score anomalies across order origin, trading history, delivery and contact details. Orders are routed into three tiers: cleared automatically, escalated for human review, or blocked. The system disposes of the large majority; only genuinely ambiguous edge cases reach a person.
The business case
The reviewers who stayed no longer do mechanical data entry. They work as risk analysts on the ambiguous middle tier, where judgement actually pays.
A leaner team runs the whole review line most of the time, with flexible reinforcement only at genuine peaks. The role moved up, rather than simply being cut.
The point of automation was never to replace reviewers. It was to give them time to actually review.
